Response to Frostee Wooldridge review of Buchannan http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty185.htm

I don't sense that Pat Buchanan has grasped the root of the issue, which someone must, if it is to be solved. How can a Catholic apologist really decode the population eugenics his institution clearly embraces? A historical context must be presented for immigration. This is impossible without a clear understanding of the economic structure of the Age of Exploration (i. e., the lack of labor to exploit royal grants to corporations, followed by the overthrow of these grants to sieze Indian lands, and grants of huge private commercial concessions underwritten by the government, such as railways, mines, timber, or grazing.). To do this involves replacing the myths of American history with critical thinking. A good overview of colonial economics and the development of big capitalism in North America is The History of the Great American Fortunes, although progressives like Gustavus Myers are blind to the role of tribal family size imperatives in causing social inequity. The Spanish American War, an essential context for current events, falls clearly within this economic history. (see Hearst, advocate of Mexican annexation with his vast private holdings run by Chinese serfs, below)

On a more practical level, Americans are trapped in a debt structure dependent on a real estate pyramid scheme of property appreciation based on underclass expansion (and below market construction labor-see New Orleans). Here in California, real estate is the biggest "industry". In America, the middle class relies on property appreciation for its entire wealth. Immigrant bashing in this context is just a ruling class red herring, a red flag for a "false flag" operation of distraction. (Immigrant romanticism and immigrant bashing are the same mystification.) Globalization is essentially an admission that after a century and a half of industrialization, no one can improve upon medieval feudalism. Your allusion to the Titanic is telling because the social structure duplicates our wealth distribution.

Its a complex subject, so I just ask one thing from people who are serious about a solution: realize that a global problem doesn't have a national solution. Also, as your website suggests, a problem of a part of nature requires cooperation with the rest, an acknowledgement that the same rules apply to us.

As Grey Brecklin writes in "Imperial San Francisco", the greatest champion of the immigration-real estate hypothesis, Hearst, is also the inventor of the media-generated terrorist attack imperialist rationale. The head of our snake is his spiritual successor Mr. Murdoch.

Respectfully

Jack Blackwell

Election Special

If the stakes of international relations are too high for Neocons to trust other governments to democratic rule unless they are pro global capitalism, it would be surprising if a different policy were followed at home.

Where is the evidence that a non globalist government would ever be allowed to take back power here through free elections? Palestine, Iran, Venezuela have all elected governments that the Neocon Junta is attempting to violently overthrow. You can be sure beyond any doubt that no legitimate referendum would support them here. I would argue that no American election at least since the concentration of information media in private elite hands has been “democratic”, since no one has been told the truth about candidates or our culture.

A good example will be Cuba after Castro. The likely timing will be that Cuba will elect a successor to Castro hostile to the US at about the time of American elections. The Mexican election is the only recent Latin election where Populists were kept by fraud from seizing power. The presence of American colonial influence was too strong, by siphoning off dissent through mass immigration, and by subsidizing corruption through remittances and drug money. Even so, they almost did the unthinkable: a non globalist government on our doorstep.